Search for: "S. R.C. T." Results 1 - 20 of 522
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
R.C. was also said to have failed to identify himself as a member of the force when a “domestic incident” involving R.C. was being investigated by a responding officer.Given that backdrop, the AD1 didn’t think R.C. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 11:33 am by Andrew Delaney
s physician saying she couldn’t testify. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 11:33 am by Andrew Delaney
s physician saying she couldn’t testify. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 6:56 am by MBettman
Proposition of Law 3 Construing R.C. 2744.09 as it is written is in keeping with this Court’s decision in Sampson v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 7:16 am by MBettman
If so, whether a plaintiff with a claim against a decedent’s estate can meet his burden under R.C. 2117.06(A)(1)(a) to ‘present’ his claim ‘[t]o the executor or administrator in writing’ when the claimant presents the claim to someone other than the fiduciary, who then submits the claim to the fiduciary within the statutory time-frame under R.C. 2117.06. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 10:34 am by Jeff Gamso
 ** Much to the victim's displeasure, the judge didn't really let him use pepper spray on Gaston but ordered a saline solution instead. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 7:42 am by MBettman
The issue in the case is whether a pawnbroker’s compliance with R.C. 4227.09 and R.C. 4727.12 in the purchase and resale of property provides it with lawful possession of the property in defense to a plaintiff’s conversion claim. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 6:34 am by MBettman
The opinion sticks to Justice French’s preferred approach, “don’t we always have to look first at the language of a statute? [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 6:25 am by MBettman
Miracle sued ODVS and the Governor’s office in the Court of Claims, alleging that his termination violated the public policy articulated in R.C. 124.27(B), R.C. 124.56, and due process, and that the governor’s senior advisor was not entitled to immunity. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 1:27 pm
 According to the Court, “[t]o allow the general provisions of R.C. 4112.99 to prevail over the specific provisions of . . . 4112.14 would ignore the relevant statutes and would turn the framework of R.C. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:08 am by MBettman
Third, a court must determine whether any defense within R.C. 2744.03 is applicable to restore the political subdivision’s immunity.) [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 6:40 am by MBettman
The trial court overruled Affinity’s motion and found that R.C. 2315.18 does not apply to defamation claims. [read post]